I was in Tokyo to attend the 19th World Congress of the International Association for the History of Religions, which followed 1700 comparative religion expert knowledge from around the world. Congress theme is "Religion, Conflict and Peace."
The Committee invited six speakers from Indonesia, of which Prof. Alef Theria Wasim from Yogyakarta that was one of the members of the Commission Program. From Aceh, Prof. Abdullah delivered the paper Zulkarnaini Religion amidst the Catastrophe, and Rescue Activities in Banda Aceh.
The first day symposium Thursday on "Religious and Dialogue among Civilizations".
Prof. Dr. Hans JA van Ginkel of the United Nations University Tokyo, Prof. Maria Luchetti Bingemer from Brazil, from Prof. Yoshiko Oda Kansai University, and Prof. Tu Wei-ming, Confucianis from Harvard University, appear as a panel.
Plenum on the second Friday morning, March 25, bertopik "Religious Dimension of War and Peace". Author book Terror in the Mind of God, Prof. Mark Juergensmeyer of the UCLA Santa Barbara, appear as two pemakalah with critic, Prof. Gerrie ter Haar of the Institute of Social Studies in The Hague Netherland and Professor Manabu Watanabe Nanzai from Nagoya University, Japan. Moderatornya, Prof. Rosalind Hackett of the University of Tennessee, who also will be the moderator of the symposium on "Proselytization".
Third plenum, Saturday morning, showing that Prof. Ibrahim Moosa came from South Africa and now works at Duke University in North Carolina USA. Prof. William Lafleur University of Pennsylvania and Prof. Haruko Okano a critic paper entitled Technology, Life and Death.
Congress will still take up to Wednesday evening, but on Monday I will have to review the Nagoya Aichi Expo 2005. 19th Congress IAHR it certainly can not escape the current political conditions, such as democracy and the pro and contra euthanasia overrides the Terri Schiavo in the U.S. does not escape from the discussion.
When discussing Moosa, Lafleur said, the time has arrived and the man surrendered to acknowledge the fact that death is not avoided. According to Lafleur, arogansi man to create the perfect human eugenic theory has produced monster fascism and German Nazi Holocaust. Therefore, it is now if this man does not fear death and would die trying to create all kinds of technology, equipment, or make a human like robot, that is contrary to nature is better forgotten.
Indeed, if the human dilemma as Schiavo case, the choice between passive euthanasia remain with the people living in the vegetative condition, very heavy indeed. Former Menlu Singapore S Rajaratnam long as testament states that when the time comes he must die and the condition of coma, he does not want to be treated vegetative, how to better use euthanasia only.
Terri Schiavo became a problem difficult because the patient is indeed from the beginning is not normal, not conscious, and mentally retarded condition. Are people such as intellectual awareness Rajaratnam still have to choose euthanasia if the physical condition biologisnya emergency. So, the problem will the chosen directly by the patient might not have a problem.
Schiavo story into a scene because her husband wanted the process of euthanasia, while parents want to maintain the condition of vegetative actually melt also.
Perhaps euthanasia dilemma that must be applied also in the war against terrorism. What the world will leave the tyrant and the terrorists have the opportunity take the nuclear world? Or made the effort to preventive and preemptive first strike potential terrorists that can do mass suicide globally? If normal people the opportunity to wait and give the terrorist Mohammad Atta nuclear practice, then prevention will be too late if it is nuclear diledakkan.
From the discussion revealed, Atta and political claims Osama bin Laden is a political or political religiusasi the diagamakan, so the search for justification for the slaughter political opponents, including people who do not sin.
Politisasi religion and God in piracy movement terrorism resulted in a political tool and a tool that even terrorists destroy the peace at all factors of religious connotations. There were also participants from Malaysia who demanded that Congress issued a resolution to censure the U.S. attacks Iraq. Of course agitasi that resonates less and did not, for the experts is that religion is being temperamental to think how the world and the religion does not become friendly after the 911 (September 11 terror events, Red).
A toothed (biksu) why the Taliban destroyed the Buddha statues in Bamian, and not at all tolerant of other religions. There are also asking why people in Tehran are selling an image or images of the Prophet Muhammad, but not arrested and is prohibited. If the dictator regimes in the Middle East slaughter thousands of its own people, why there is no resistance and disapproval?
Appear to have "compliance" to the slaughter by a fellow sovereign nations. That be is the slaughter. If the dictator of the nation itself, is already, it is considered the fate destiny and the will of God. If other nations are killing dictator, I must rise to resistance only on the basis of differences in nationality. However, the solidarity in the matter of Iraq and the Taliban are still the dominant way to create clarity of thinking, whether religious war Osama model should continue to be glorified and dipopulerkan.
That is the question that appears on the back of the participants who represent all that is in the religious world. If the War Cross 10-century to be taken to 20th century with nuclear weapons, then there will be a risk of suicide worldwide.
In fact, in parallel nuclear threat does not only come from the Middle East, but can also come from Kim Jong-il. Japan is very concerned with a nuclear North Korea. So, in terms of that, grouping North Korea in the axis of evil by George Bush is the real reveal that carnality terrorism monopoly not only Osama bin Laden, but also satrap model Kim Jong-il.
The model terrorist Osama and Kim Jong-il, if the world still using the old paradigm, waiting for new evidence first sting, then at that time was already too late. Because, man and the world is destroyed by a nuclear diledakkan calculations without humanity, but is desperate come the end of the age model. However, the world seems more likely to be the strength seems to represent the poor and oppressed people, and the subterfuge and human rights national sovereignty, rejecting intervention and preventive action model George Bush.
According to me, which is less by the terrorism supporter of Resurrection, is the greatness of God that will not be willing that the world was billions of geophysics has been years and still have prospects survive billions of years. God is pure will have a methodology for and destroy human memunahkan profess to represent the Lord, want to condemn other human beings through 911 nuclear and global mass euthanasia. Sure I was too serious for dipasrahkan only on Osama bin Laden and supporting.
Source: The Jakarta Post
The Committee invited six speakers from Indonesia, of which Prof. Alef Theria Wasim from Yogyakarta that was one of the members of the Commission Program. From Aceh, Prof. Abdullah delivered the paper Zulkarnaini Religion amidst the Catastrophe, and Rescue Activities in Banda Aceh.
The first day symposium Thursday on "Religious and Dialogue among Civilizations".
Prof. Dr. Hans JA van Ginkel of the United Nations University Tokyo, Prof. Maria Luchetti Bingemer from Brazil, from Prof. Yoshiko Oda Kansai University, and Prof. Tu Wei-ming, Confucianis from Harvard University, appear as a panel.
Plenum on the second Friday morning, March 25, bertopik "Religious Dimension of War and Peace". Author book Terror in the Mind of God, Prof. Mark Juergensmeyer of the UCLA Santa Barbara, appear as two pemakalah with critic, Prof. Gerrie ter Haar of the Institute of Social Studies in The Hague Netherland and Professor Manabu Watanabe Nanzai from Nagoya University, Japan. Moderatornya, Prof. Rosalind Hackett of the University of Tennessee, who also will be the moderator of the symposium on "Proselytization".
Third plenum, Saturday morning, showing that Prof. Ibrahim Moosa came from South Africa and now works at Duke University in North Carolina USA. Prof. William Lafleur University of Pennsylvania and Prof. Haruko Okano a critic paper entitled Technology, Life and Death.
Congress will still take up to Wednesday evening, but on Monday I will have to review the Nagoya Aichi Expo 2005. 19th Congress IAHR it certainly can not escape the current political conditions, such as democracy and the pro and contra euthanasia overrides the Terri Schiavo in the U.S. does not escape from the discussion.
When discussing Moosa, Lafleur said, the time has arrived and the man surrendered to acknowledge the fact that death is not avoided. According to Lafleur, arogansi man to create the perfect human eugenic theory has produced monster fascism and German Nazi Holocaust. Therefore, it is now if this man does not fear death and would die trying to create all kinds of technology, equipment, or make a human like robot, that is contrary to nature is better forgotten.
Indeed, if the human dilemma as Schiavo case, the choice between passive euthanasia remain with the people living in the vegetative condition, very heavy indeed. Former Menlu Singapore S Rajaratnam long as testament states that when the time comes he must die and the condition of coma, he does not want to be treated vegetative, how to better use euthanasia only.
Terri Schiavo became a problem difficult because the patient is indeed from the beginning is not normal, not conscious, and mentally retarded condition. Are people such as intellectual awareness Rajaratnam still have to choose euthanasia if the physical condition biologisnya emergency. So, the problem will the chosen directly by the patient might not have a problem.
Schiavo story into a scene because her husband wanted the process of euthanasia, while parents want to maintain the condition of vegetative actually melt also.
Perhaps euthanasia dilemma that must be applied also in the war against terrorism. What the world will leave the tyrant and the terrorists have the opportunity take the nuclear world? Or made the effort to preventive and preemptive first strike potential terrorists that can do mass suicide globally? If normal people the opportunity to wait and give the terrorist Mohammad Atta nuclear practice, then prevention will be too late if it is nuclear diledakkan.
From the discussion revealed, Atta and political claims Osama bin Laden is a political or political religiusasi the diagamakan, so the search for justification for the slaughter political opponents, including people who do not sin.
Politisasi religion and God in piracy movement terrorism resulted in a political tool and a tool that even terrorists destroy the peace at all factors of religious connotations. There were also participants from Malaysia who demanded that Congress issued a resolution to censure the U.S. attacks Iraq. Of course agitasi that resonates less and did not, for the experts is that religion is being temperamental to think how the world and the religion does not become friendly after the 911 (September 11 terror events, Red).
A toothed (biksu) why the Taliban destroyed the Buddha statues in Bamian, and not at all tolerant of other religions. There are also asking why people in Tehran are selling an image or images of the Prophet Muhammad, but not arrested and is prohibited. If the dictator regimes in the Middle East slaughter thousands of its own people, why there is no resistance and disapproval?
Appear to have "compliance" to the slaughter by a fellow sovereign nations. That be is the slaughter. If the dictator of the nation itself, is already, it is considered the fate destiny and the will of God. If other nations are killing dictator, I must rise to resistance only on the basis of differences in nationality. However, the solidarity in the matter of Iraq and the Taliban are still the dominant way to create clarity of thinking, whether religious war Osama model should continue to be glorified and dipopulerkan.
That is the question that appears on the back of the participants who represent all that is in the religious world. If the War Cross 10-century to be taken to 20th century with nuclear weapons, then there will be a risk of suicide worldwide.
In fact, in parallel nuclear threat does not only come from the Middle East, but can also come from Kim Jong-il. Japan is very concerned with a nuclear North Korea. So, in terms of that, grouping North Korea in the axis of evil by George Bush is the real reveal that carnality terrorism monopoly not only Osama bin Laden, but also satrap model Kim Jong-il.
The model terrorist Osama and Kim Jong-il, if the world still using the old paradigm, waiting for new evidence first sting, then at that time was already too late. Because, man and the world is destroyed by a nuclear diledakkan calculations without humanity, but is desperate come the end of the age model. However, the world seems more likely to be the strength seems to represent the poor and oppressed people, and the subterfuge and human rights national sovereignty, rejecting intervention and preventive action model George Bush.
According to me, which is less by the terrorism supporter of Resurrection, is the greatness of God that will not be willing that the world was billions of geophysics has been years and still have prospects survive billions of years. God is pure will have a methodology for and destroy human memunahkan profess to represent the Lord, want to condemn other human beings through 911 nuclear and global mass euthanasia. Sure I was too serious for dipasrahkan only on Osama bin Laden and supporting.
Source: The Jakarta Post
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar